Newspaper reports from the
continent rekindled interest in the alleged Jewish threat even as stories from
the liberal press generated sympathy for Jewish victims. In June 1858 in the
Papal city of Bologna, Vatican officials seized
and transported to Rome
a young Jewish boy, Edgardo Mortara. There he was taken to the House of the
Catechumens to be instructed as a Catholic, and subsequently embraced by Pope
Pius IX as his “son.” The ostensible rationale for this cruel abduction was
that a Christian girl, while working for his family, had baptized the boy when
he was a sick baby believing him to be close to death. Under Church law, a
baptized child must be raised a Catholic. Despite the frantic efforts of the
family and the local and international Jewish community to secure his release,
the boy became a devout Catholic and later a priest. For years Edgardo Mortara
was completely alienated from his family because they would not convert to the
true faith. Although he had a reunion with his mother twenty years after the
kidnapping, he could not persuade her to convert. The supreme irony was that he
lived a long life to the age of eighty-eight and died in Belgium on March 11, 1940, one
month before the Nazis fanned into the country. Nazi race laws would have
classified him as a Jew. This irony underscores a fundamental distinction
between the treatment by the Catholic Church with respect to Mortara, as
deplorable as it was, and Nazi immutable race laws; they would have killed him
as a child and as an aged adult priest.
The kidnapping aroused
international condemnation, especially in Catholic France and the United States, but not from the British
government, who believed their relationship with the Vatican was already strained. The
Catholic Church, believing that it was under siege from godless socialists and
indifferent liberals, defended itself through its own newspapers by going on
the offensive. In January 1859 the Vatican press reported the murder of a
Christian boy in what is modern Romania,
and repeated the blood libel story which sparked a pogrom against Jews. The
most suspicious Jews were arrested but, according to rumour, because Jewish
money had bribed witnesses, no proof was found. In other words, while liberals
were castigating the Church for raising Edgardo Mortara in a loving manner,
Jews were murdering children. What the newspaper omitted to report was that the
boy’s uncle was being held for his murder. The belief that Christian children
were killed and their blood drained was widely propagated in Italy by parish priests, Lenten
sermons, and the Catholic press. Two years earlier, for polemical reasons, the
Catholic Italian press had reported that a Jewish merchant abducted and drained
the blood of a 23-year old Christian servant. Although the trial revealed that
the woman had invented the story to divert suspicion from her own crime of
stealing from her employer, the story carried credibility with ordinary people
for whom Dracula-like folk tales were a part of their daily culture.[1]
The effect of these bizarre developments on the English collective
psyche is difficult to calibrate.
Certainly the vast majority of informed people were appalled by the kidnapping and blood libel trials.
Among a majority of Protestants, especially the Protestant Evangelical Alliance that had campaigned
vigorously on behalf of the Mortara family, the events bolstered traditional antipathies
toward Roman Catholicism. In England the Irish were “sunk in superstition and degradation”
because of the influence of Catholicism, and Evangelicals tried unsuccessfully to rescue them
from the “perverse effects of Catholic corruption.” Their opposition to the Irish controlling their own
affairs was in part the conviction that Home Rule meant Rome rule.[2] For most English Protestants,
corruption included papal despotism and the influence of the parish priests over their emotional,
indolent and intemperate flock that included imparting to them a belief in the blood libel.
Certainly the vast majority of informed people were appalled by the kidnapping and blood libel trials.
Among a majority of Protestants, especially the Protestant Evangelical Alliance that had campaigned
vigorously on behalf of the Mortara family, the events bolstered traditional antipathies
toward Roman Catholicism. In England the Irish were “sunk in superstition and degradation”
because of the influence of Catholicism, and Evangelicals tried unsuccessfully to rescue them
from the “perverse effects of Catholic corruption.” Their opposition to the Irish controlling their own
affairs was in part the conviction that Home Rule meant Rome rule.[2] For most English Protestants,
corruption included papal despotism and the influence of the parish priests over their emotional,
indolent and intemperate flock that included imparting to them a belief in the blood libel.
No comments:
Post a Comment