In 1851 Henry Mayhew, journalist,
satirist and occasional actor published his compilation of articles gathered during the 1840s for his social survey report that he titled
London Labour and the London Poor. Motivated by yet another cholera epidemic,
Mayhew accented the parasitical nature of the street people. Based upon
open-ended questionnaires, his report combined a genuine sympathy for the
outcast poor and vivid degenerationist language. When he compared the street
folk of London to “wandering tribes” of Africa, he employed a proto-Lombrosian
emphasis on physiognomy. He distinguished the "broad lozenge–shaped faces” and “organs
subservient to sensation and the animal faculties,” of the nomad with the
civilized man’s oval-shaped head signifying those who “depend mainly on their
knowledge…for the necessities and comforts of life.” The wanderer in contrast
to the civilized man was characterized by his “repugnance to regular and
continuous work…his extraordinary powers of enduring privation—his
comparative insensibility to pain…[his] disregard of female honour—[his] love
of cruelty.”
These descriptive passages, albeit with less
scientific cachet, carried the same stigma that Lombroso later produced when he
used the epithets, born criminals savages and lower races to categorize certain
people. As if a traveler in an exotic, unknown land, Mayhew compared the
costermongers or food hawkers, who served local street markets, to a raucous
foreign tribe of bushmen in Africa with their own esoteric slang, their
penchant for fighting, drinking and gambling, and insensitivity to their women.
He dismissed “the vagrant beggars and pilferers of the country” as feckless
with few moral restraints who therefore were dangerous, “degraded and vicious.”
He wondered whether their nomadic lifestyle caused the blood to circulate to
the surface of the body strengthening the muscles at the expense of the mind.
He compared them to destitute vagabonds who did “nothing whatsoever for their
living, but [move] from place to place preying upon the earnings of the more
industrious portion of the community.” There is a Gothic element implicit in
Mayhew’s account of the parasitical nature of the costermongers who fed upon
the ‘industrious that is echoed almost fifty years later by Bram Stoker in his portrayal of vampires who must consume the
blood of human beings to perpetuate their undead existence. Just as the
costermongers’ motivation in life was to satisfy basic physical needs, so
Dracula’s is to feed upon others so that he can exist and replicate. Given the
sheer physicality of this peripatetic crew, Mayhew warned that society might be
in danger of reducing human value to its most corporeal attributes:
Everything is
sacrificed—as, indeed, under the circumstances it must be—in the struggle
to
live—aye and to live merely.
Mind, heart, and soul, are all absorbed in the belly. The rudest
form of animal
life, physiologists tell us, is simply a locomotive stomach. Verily, it would
appear if our social state had a tendency to make the highest animal sink into
the lowest.
Consider the following passage in which the distinguished
professor, the Dutch Van Helsing, the acknowledged leader of the vampire hunters, warns
his followers in his broken English that Dracula’s physical strength poses
acute dangers for society (like the costermongers) because of the absence of
any moral dimension:
The nosferatu do not die like the bee when
he sting [sic] once. He is only stronger; and being
stronger, have yet more power to work evil. This vampire is [sic] amongst us is of himself so
strong in person as twenty men; he is of cunning more than mortal, for his cunning to be the
growth of ages.
stronger, have yet more power to work evil. This vampire is [sic] amongst us is of himself so
strong in person as twenty men; he is of cunning more than mortal, for his cunning to be the
growth of ages.
Victorian costermongers |
Concurrently Mayhew, who considered himself a
reformer, recognized that slum conditions could produce capable but desperate
individuals who would have benefited from education and healthy amusements if
those had been provided by their “culpable…betters.” He was referring to the vagrants who
scavenged on the streets and the little watercress girls and desperate men, who
frantically scratched out an existence on the waterfront, willing to do the
scut work (the dirtiest, most disagreeable) necessary to survive. He hoped
to impress upon his readers that these people too were “of English society,
though separate from it, related to the middle class but a race apart from it,
fellow inhabitants of the same city but members of a different tribe.” Mayhew continued in the tradition that
conditions were reversible even when he was unable to offer program
alternatives.
Mayhew's pioneering work in documenting the lives of the poorest in society continues as reporters and filmmakers expose the conditions under which street people endured by living among them, sometimes with tragic results. The online journal, Gawker, recently reported that a young, aspiring filmmaker in Newcastle UK froze to death when overnight temperatures dipped to below zero Celsius. He had hoped that his film on street people would launch his career.
Mayhew's pioneering work in documenting the lives of the poorest in society continues as reporters and filmmakers expose the conditions under which street people endured by living among them, sometimes with tragic results. The online journal, Gawker, recently reported that a young, aspiring filmmaker in Newcastle UK froze to death when overnight temperatures dipped to below zero Celsius. He had hoped that his film on street people would launch his career.
No comments:
Post a Comment