Colson Whitehead photographed by Chris Close |
Most of us do not harbour a benign view of
slavery, namely the belief that the owners of slaves were reluctant masters who
generally cared for the well being of their human property. There are, however egregious
exceptions. In 2016 a curious children's book appeared, A Birthday Cake for George Washington, that portrayed happy slave
children baking a cake for the first President, a whitewash of slavery that
produced a swift and sharp backlash prompting the publisher to withdraw the
book. More disturbing is that Roy Moore, the Republican Senate candidate for
Alabama in the 2018 election and
subsequently lost in one of the America's reddest states, publicly stated that
America was great when slavery prevailed because black families were kept
together, a grotesque misrepresentation of the historical reality when families
were frequently and viciously torn apart.
Instead, we are likely to view slavery as harsh, ruthless, even tragic. But these adjectives do not fully capture the systemic cruelty visited upon slaves by sadistic overseers and psychopathic owners. That gritty realism is viscerally evoked in Colson Whitehead's 2014 The Underground Railway which earned both the Pulitzer and the National Book Award, and Esi Edugan's 2018 Washington Black that won the Scotiabank Giller award. The trajectory of both novels are vastly different but the opening chapters bear a striking resemblance: a harrowing captivity narrative illustrating the Hobbesian adage that life (on a slave plantation) was "solitary, poor nasty, brutish and short."
Instead, we are likely to view slavery as harsh, ruthless, even tragic. But these adjectives do not fully capture the systemic cruelty visited upon slaves by sadistic overseers and psychopathic owners. That gritty realism is viscerally evoked in Colson Whitehead's 2014 The Underground Railway which earned both the Pulitzer and the National Book Award, and Esi Edugan's 2018 Washington Black that won the Scotiabank Giller award. The trajectory of both novels are vastly different but the opening chapters bear a striking resemblance: a harrowing captivity narrative illustrating the Hobbesian adage that life (on a slave plantation) was "solitary, poor nasty, brutish and short."
While Washington
is set in the early 19th century on a Barbados sugar cane plantation, Underground takes place at the same time
on a cotton plantation in Georgia. In the former, a slave has his tongue cut
out for back talk; in the latter, a slave is blinded for attempting to read. The
thrashings and mutilations are so common in Washington that the young eponymous protagonist is
encouraged to enter into a suicide pact. Cora, the protagonist in Underground has seen a "woman
carved open to the bones with cat-o'-nine tails" and is so severely
whipped herself that she is willing to attempt an escape
fully realizing the horrible punishment awaiting her if she fails: a severe
lashing followed by a vicious rape, hanging or being doused with oil and roasted to the
amusement of visitors.
The opening chapters in both novels cataloging
the meticulous horror resemble Steve
McQueen's film adaptation of the same name, Solomon Northup's 12 years a Slave, including a slave's longing to die, the persistent wail of a mother separated from her children and the
depiction of increasingly unhinged slave owners. But Edugyan and Whitehead
decamp from the plantation relatively early on in their narratives possibly prolonging the lives of their protagonists. Possibly,
especially in Cora's situation, because she is tenaciously pursued by an obsessive slave catcher still seething that he
never apprehended Cora's mother who fled years earlier. At any rate, these
novels are more imaginative and insightful than the film about race relations
in exploring in their different ways the legacy of the slave experience with both its
visible and invisible scars. One of those differences resides in the structure: Edugyan allows her narrative to develop chronologically, whereas Whitehead
frequently interrupts it and circles back to follow through with the aftermath
of what occurred on an earlier occasion.
On a personal note, I find mindless brutality, especially with prolonged close-ups of vicious beatings, portrayed by actors less palatable than to read about it. Although both authors never shy away from exposing the grisly violence,
they avoid sensationalizing or offering horror porn. Instead, the violence is frequently expressed in deadpan
language or left to our imagination. One brief example: Whitehead in effects
pulls the camera away so that Cora, as well as the reader,
is spared witnessing the plight of two her apprehended white benefactors.
is spared witnessing the plight of two her apprehended white benefactors.
It is not my intention to discuss more about Washington Black except to mention that her main character
escapes the plantation hell by a hot-air balloon under the protection of a
kinder, scientifically inclined owner. By contrast, Whitehead's protagonist flees with
a fellow slave on an underground railroad, not the metaphor for a network of secret societies, as exemplified in the
award-winning history of one couple's successful escape to Canada, I've Got a Home in Glory Land, or the recent film Harriet, but an
actual locomotive train. To reach a new destination Cora would descend through
trapdoors beneath homes and barns into caves before accessing a
locomotive. It could widely vary from
the primitive as she thrashes about in the darkness to avoid critters to
one endowed with spacious comfort.
Whitehead's decision to incorporate subterranean trains
lends the novel a touch of magical
realism allowing him to explore the plight of runaways as an allegorical fable
akin to the specifically cited Gulliver's
Travels. Despite the mode of narrating an alternative reality, he remains
tethered to historical reality if not always the ante-bellum reality. As one example of the depth of his historical awareness, he rightly asserts that the
underground railroad never ventured as far south as Georgia.
Each state that Cora arrives at is vastly different. In South
Carolina, she is initially grateful that its denizens appear to possess a
more enlightened, albeit paternalistic, attitude toward blacks in which she is
able to sleep in a bed for the first time in her life and learn to read without
fear. Yet she is pressured to volunteer
for a kitschy "Museum of National Wonders" in which Cora would
re-enact before white viewers in glass-enclosed dioramas a sugar-coated version
of life on a slave ship and a "Typical Day" on a plantation, tableaux
that enable Whitehead to satirize museums that sanitize slave realities. Much more sinister is what
occurs in hospitals where doctors administer sugar water to participants who
were suffering from the tertiary stages of syphilis, a stark reference to the
notorious but unnamed Tuskegee study that took place in Alabama for over forty years in the
twentieth century. There is also the unnerving attraction for eugenics when one
doctor muses, "What if we performed adjustments to the niggers' patterns
and removed those of melancholic tendency." Whitehead is clearly alluding
to the forced sterilization of both black men and women (as well as others)
that has frequently transpired over the years.
Tuskegee Study |
In North Carolina, the mask of white gentility has
been ripped off as a brazenly white supremacist government dispenses cruelty.
It is a capital offence for blacks to enter the state and for any whites who
shield them. And forget any illusion of due process. In one episode that carries an unsettling resonance for a Canadian
given the recent revelations about our Prime Minister, Cora hiding in an attic
of white sympathizers, watches the nightly entertainment in the town square.
There she observes coon shows as white men with painted black faces perform cockamamie caricatures followed by the hanging of captured runaways, a Friday ritual that is enacted in every town. And
what is the end goal behind the so-called "Freedom Trail" lined with
"corpses hung from trees as rotting ornaments?" One character puts
it succinctly — to "abolish niggers." In this section, Whitehead's
subtext are the draconian race laws, the derisive stereotypes of its cultural
life and the thousands of lynchings that
disfigured primarily the South during the Jim Crow era, a reign of terror from the late nineteenth century well into the 1960s, in reality, slavery by other means.
Even in Indiana where Cora joins a prosperous all
black Utopian apparently safe community, the spectre of danger looms. What ensues is reminiscent of the 1921 massacre of blacks that occurred on an equally
prosperous Greenwood Ave. in Tulsa Oklahoma and perhaps the
worst massacre in American history a century ago in the plantation region of Elaine. (The Tulsa massacre is the starting point of the intriguing HBO series, Watchmen, that explores race relations primarily set in an alternative reality.)
Years earlier the founder and patriarch of the community observed that "racial violence becomes more vicious in its expression;" he might have added especially when black people advance. The sentiments expressed could also be those of the author thinking about what later materialized at Ferguson and other places where police killed unarmed blacks without any accountability. Or the acquittal of a white man who killed an unarmed Trayvon Martin, all as payback for a black man in the White House. Later when another member wonders whether all former traumatized slaves can become productive members of society, he could be speaking for those today who similarly question the future of the equally traumatized urban underclass.
Years earlier the founder and patriarch of the community observed that "racial violence becomes more vicious in its expression;" he might have added especially when black people advance. The sentiments expressed could also be those of the author thinking about what later materialized at Ferguson and other places where police killed unarmed blacks without any accountability. Or the acquittal of a white man who killed an unarmed Trayvon Martin, all as payback for a black man in the White House. Later when another member wonders whether all former traumatized slaves can become productive members of society, he could be speaking for those today who similarly question the future of the equally traumatized urban underclass.
In sum, a fugitive slave narrative à la Frederick
Douglass transcends the genre as it morphs into an allegorical odyssey of the
troubled race relations that thread through American history down to the
present. Yet despite the savagery, the novel is animated by hope, especially in
the Indiana community where the spirited conversations about the future
foreshadow the political differences among African Americans that have
punctuated the twentieth century. And we must not forget Cora whose indomitable
spirit remains alive at the conclusion even though her future remains
uncertain. The Underground Railroad is
a layered, refreshingly original novel.
While The Underground
Railroad shatters any lingering
illusions about the benevolence of slavery and allows the reader to bear
witness to some of the lesser known episodes throughout American history, his
readers will likely know something about that subject matter. The same cannot
be said for Whitehead's latest novel, Nickel
Boys (Double Day, 2019), that is based on a so-called reform school which few
would have known about. As Whitehead writes in his acknowledgements, he never
heard about the reign of terror at the Dozier School for Boys in Florida that
operated for over one hundred years and was only closed in 2011 until 2014 when he
read about it in The Tampa Times.
According to the article, archeology students at a Florida university were
digging up and trying to identify the remains of students at Dozier who had
been mutilated, murdered and buried in a secret graveyard "erased from
history."
Whitehead resurrects this nearly-expunged chapter
of racial terrorism by fictionalizing the boys who spent time at
this house of horror by creating the Nickel Academy of Eleanor Florida. At
night the superintendent administers "punishment" with a three-foot
long strap called Black Beauty at the so-called "White House."The beatings are so horrific that the ensuing screams are drowned out by a giant industrial
fan. Beyond that site, worse things are inflicted on boys who never return but are
buried in unmarked graves called "Boot Hill."Thankfully, Whitehead
never takes the reader there. Unlike his earlier novel, Whitehead has stripped Nickel Boys of any trace of magical
realism. Still retaining his penchant for chronological switches, deadpan
language and above all restraint, his latest novel feels like a mash up of documentary
realism and a terrifying Gothic novel.
Whitehead has referred to Railroad as an
"Obama" novel and Boys as "Trumpian," Although in the article Whitehead refers to specific illiberal changes from the last three years, I think that he is hinting at something deeper in the novel. Whereas the earlier novel exudes traces of hope his most recent is much bleaker in tone. The current president tweets messages in language
that is consistently demeaning to African Americans, and has attempted to
reverse the progressive initiatives of his predecessor. The time period of most
of The Boys from the early to mid
1960s is one of measured optimism that includes the gradual desegregation of
the public schools as a result of the 1954 Supreme Court decision, the civil
rights movement inspired by the lofty rhetoric and courageous actions of Martin
Luther King among others, and the decision by Congress with the support of President Johnson
to pass vital legislation to end discrimination in public facilities and
voting. These milestones of
hope, that could be associated with the Obama spirit, are absent
in the captivity chapters of Boys. Indeed, the novel might be
viewed as a microcosm for Jim Crow which is viciously alive and thriving.
The one hope that initially remains alive for the young protagonist, Elwood Curtis, are the speeches of King heard on a LP
recording that he received as a 1962
Christmas gift. He listens to them constantly and becomes emboldened believing that someday he could be part of
the Civil Rights Movement. We first meet him as a conscientious student
attending a segregated school in Tallahassee, (in violation of the Brown
decision by the Supreme Court) working diligently and getting good grades. His
teacher recognizes his potential and arranges for him to attend advanced
classes at a college outside the city. Hitchhiking a ride in what turns out to
be a stolen car, the police arrest him even though he is the passenger and
because he is black. As a result of this miscarriage of justice, he is
incarcerated in The Nickel Academy.
Arthur A. Dozier School for Boys |
But that faith is fragile. Over time the arbitrary brutality and unrelenting abuse of power grind him down. At one poignant and pivotal moment in his life, he quotes King: "Throw us in jail and we will still love you....We will not only win freedom for ourselves, we will so appeal to your heart and your conscience that we will win you in the process and our victory will be a double victory." Elwood begins to question whether decency resides in every human heart and whether King was asking too much. Writing in the third person, Whitehead speaks for Elwood, "No, he could not make that leap to love." For this reader who has been buoyed by the uplifting eloquence of King, Elwood's responses are a sobering reminder that most of us never endured the hellscape depicted in this novel, and as Elwood is acutely aware, neither did King when he spent a brief time in Birmingham jail.
Despite his cynicism, Turner turns out to be a kind
and courageous friend to Elwood that persists for years down to the final pages.
It would be a spoiler to reveal more details but Whitehead, pulling us both forth in time several years
and then wrenching us back again to the 1960s at Nickel, manages to deliver a
moving and unexpected conclusion. It is a
stunning, totally unsentimental ending and a testament to his artistry. By the
time we finish this masterful novel, we understand that the epithet racial
progress should at best be used
cautiously. In a time of mass incarceration and simmering racism—often fanned
by the President—we should be grateful to Whitehead for challenging us to
shred any illusions we might still
retain about a "post-racial presidency,"given the dog whistle racist
politics that have moved from the fringe to mainstream politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment